part of an ongoing series of columns I’ve written, reprinted from the TU Rambler.
2 March 2009.
As part of TU’s delegation to the 2009 PowerShift conference, I spent the last several days in our nation’s capitol, an experience which has illuminated much for me.
The city seems to consist entirely of white marble neoclassical buildings and brings to mind imperial Rome—which was built by architects who believed their monuments would last forever, only to have their empire fall within a few hundred years. Such is our similar position: our current (I would like to say previous) unsustainable way of life, in which we see our species as immortal and believe that the world’s seemingly infinite resources are ours for the taking, can only end with our own destruction. While exploring the National Mall, a friend and I wondered what would linger in a thousand years after humans check out. Not much, we hoped; toppled columns and ruins among a young forest; the remains of the Washington Monument leaning at a 45-degree angle.
While I heard many speakers this weekend discuss a better (and very achievable) more sustainable future—one brought about by nonviolent action and progressive legislation, powered by clean and renewable energy, and which justly incorporates marginalized groups—I heard no-one mention what I believe to be the key in the whole issue—the modern disconnect from the natural world; it seemed to me that we are attempting to fix the symptoms, and not the root problem.
One of PowerShift’s keynote speakers, Van Jones (named a TIME 2008 Environmental Hero), explained that focusing on just fixing our energy issues wouldn’t necessarily ensure survival for our world; we’ll just have solar tanks and geothermal fighter jets. Climate change is not, he said, just a technological, political, legislative, or business challenge; it’s a moral challenge.
I was reminded of what Erik Reece (a professor at University of Kentucky) wrote in the conclusion to his 2006 book Lost Mountain:
“While [the] sense of kinship among all living things can be explained through molecular biology, it will only be a force for change, a moral force, if it is understood by the individual. No one wants to be told what to do: turn off lights, drive less, recycle. But if a desire to change the way one consumes limited resources comes out of an inner conviction, a deep feeling of conscience, then it is not too late for a real transformation of our culture.”
Some content on this page was disabled on 19 November, 2016 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Devon E. E. Weston. You can learn more about the DMCA here: